Who are we?
How can I take action?
What are we doing?
How can I learn more?
Contact Us
Home
 


XXX
Legislative Action CenterIssues • Alerts • Legislative Principles

 

 

Current Alert • Alert Archives

 

California Church IMPACT
March 2, 2004 Primary Election
Ballot Proposition Recommendations

The positions listed below represent the decisions of the Board of Directors of California Church IMPACT. While Board members come from various member denominations, their views do not necessarily represent their denomination's position on specific recommendations.


Proposition 55
The Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2004.

This bond act provides $12.3 billion for education facilities at all levels to end overcrowding and repair older schools. $10 billion will be for K-12; $2.3 billion for higher education. This fund is more flexible in targeting educational facility needs than are local bonds and revenue sources. It will substantially improve the educational infrastructure, much of which has been long neglected, especially in inner-city areas where the need for quality educational facilities is greatest. Because it provides for specific improvements in schools, it generates social wealth that contributes to the growth and improvement of our state and society. This is a social good for our children whose education depends in part on quality environments in which to learn. Bonds for actual value contribute to the well-being of our economy. Thus, we support this bond measure to support our educational infrastructure.

WE RECOMMEND A “YES” VOTE.


Proposition 56
State Budget, Related Taxes, and Reserve, Voting Requirements, Penalties, Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.

This initiative will reduce the vote needed to pass the budget and tax legislation from the current 2/3 "supermajority" to 55%. Only two other states, Rhode Island and Arkansas, have this requirement, and the majority of states provide for a simple majority. Legislators will be held accountable for passing budgets by the constitutionally-mandated deadline of June 15 or will permanently lose all pay, benefits, and perquisites for each day the budget is late. Legislators will also be unable to leave town or engage in any business other than passing the budget if they miss the constitutional deadline.

In addition, this initiative requires a strong "lockbox" budget reserve that sets aside a significant portion of budget surplus that can be used only by declared emergency or to protect residents in years of real budget shortfalls. California Church IMPACT has supported this measure from the outset as a way of ending the gridlock and expansion of costs to taxpayers. Studies have indicated that the wanton politics of vote-getting to obtain the 2/3 majority contribute to increased spending rather than reducing it. Deal-making has not produced an on-time budget for California since 1986. Late and irresponsible budgets cost the state in lost federal revenues, additional spending for 'pork' to get votes, and crises in programs and for small business vendors that have to borrow to cover their costs until the budget is done. Worries about wanton tax increases are not realistic since the governor retains a line-item veto against any portion of the budget.

Proposition 56 offers California a more rational budget process than we now have. Currently the votes for and against the budget are politically structured and are not easily discovered by constituents. Votes on the budget will become matters of public record for which legislators will be accountable. More importantly, votes will reflect members' conscience and citizens' preference rather than demanded as evidence of party loyalty obtained by coercion and threat. It is considerably past time for California to have a rational mode of budget accountability. We strongly support this initiative.

WE RECOMMEND A "YES" VOTE.


Proposition 57
For Proposition 57 to pass, Proposition 58 must also pass.
The Economic Bond Recovery Act

This proposition authorizes a one-time bond permitting borrowing of up to $15 billion. Ostensibly it is to cover the deficit incurred in 2003 from last-minute shortfalls that did not meet existing state obligations and the hole left from the decision not to reinstate the 1998 levels in the vehicle license fee. As a compromise measure supported by members of both parties plus the governor, this bond will cost far less than the original 30-year proposal.

Partly financed by a revenue stream comprised of 1/4 cent from the existing sales tax (with no tax increase) it will be repaid over 15 years rather than the 30 years originally proposed. Nevertheless, it will cost nearly double its face value with the debt service being extracted from social and educational programs. It is a moral challenge for people of faith to oppose this bond since the risk is that the revenue gap will also be extracted from those programs. However, support for the bond sets a dangerous precedent of borrowing to cover what has already been spent and that creates no new value. The state therefore will be paying $30 billion for 15 years to fill the $8.9 billion hole left in the 2003 spending and the $3 billion lost from restoring the VLF.

We urge people of the faith community to work for a genuinely fair budget with taxes on upper incomes restored to 1998 levels and a renewed look at removing special interest deductions among other alternatives. It is time that the solutions to our fiscal crisis truly 'share the pain' rather than placing the burden exclusively on those in need by burying their survival programs under mountains of debt.

WE RECOMMEND A "NO" VOTE.


Proposition 58
For Proposition 58 to pass, Proposition 57 must also pass.
The California Balanced Budget Act.

This proposition offers much less than it first appears. It requires the state to create a balanced budget, and, like Proposition 56, to establish a 'rainy day fund.' The end result is to prevent the issuing of general deficit bonds such as that in Proposition 57 in the future. However, there are numerous loopholes and weaknesses according to the Legislative Analyst's Office (www.lao.ca.gov). The reserve, or Budget Stabilization Account, is larger than those previously proposed, but the BSA has no "lockbox" protections at all. The governor can prohibit putting funds into the BSA for any reason while the Legislature and Executive can withdraw them for virtually any reason. Also, it is intended that portions of the BSA will be directed toward repayment of the existing bond, but all the funds can be spent immediately on the heels of being saved for any reason at all. Borrowing of long-term bonds will be prohibited, but borrowing of short-term funds or between state funds (robbing Peter to pay Paul) will in no way be restricted. The state constitution already prohibits long-term borrowing without voter approval, so that increased short-term borrowing would be a constant risk. This measure provides no genuine protections for either a balanced budget or for a genuine reserve.

WE RECOMMEND A "NO" VOTE.


_________________________________________________________
SUMMARY OF CALIFORNIA CHURCH IMPACT POSITIONS
March, 2004 Ballot Propositions

Proposition 55 YES
Proposition 56 YES
Proposition 57 NO
Proposition 58 NO

As of January 1, 2003, all Legislative News Alerts will be sent electronically, with the exception of Ballot Recommendations, which are printed and mailed. Please send us your e-mail address so that we may keep you up to date on legislative issues.

Send your name, address with ZIP, and e-mail address to: impactinfo@calchurches.org

Thank you!


California Church IMPACT’s Ballot Proposition recommendations are among the most respected and sought-after guides in the state. We freely give permission to reproduce and distribute the print or electronic versions as you wish. Please help us continue to provide this service and our other programs to advocate for California’s most vulnerable citizens! Send your contribution today to California Church IMPACT, 2715 K St. Suite D, Sacramento CA 95816. Because we use these funds for advocacy, contributions are not tax-deductible. Thank you!

If you have further questions, please feel free to contact us.

Elizabeth Sholes
Public Policy Coordinator
California Council of Churches/California Church IMPACT
2715 K Street, Suite D
Sacramento, CA 95816
(916) 442-5447
(916) 442-3036-FAX
www.calchurches.org

 


 

 

Who are we? | How can I take action? | What are we doing?
How can I learn more? | Contact Us | Home

California Council of Churches/California Church Impact ©2002